SIC 3721

Companies in this industry

Industry report:

This category includes establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing or assembling complete aircraft. This industry also includes establishments owned by aircraft manufacturers and primarily engaged in research and development on aircraft, whether from enterprise funds or on a contract or fee basis. Also included are establishments engaged in repairing and rebuilding aircraft on a factory basis. Establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing engines and other aircraft parts and auxiliary equipment are classified in SIC 3724: Aircraft Engines and Engine Parts and SIC 3728: Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment, Not Elsewhere Classified. Establishments primarily engaged in the repair of aircraft, except on a factory basis, are classified in SIC 4581: Airports, Flying Fields, and Airport Terminal Services; and research and development on aircraft by establishments not owned by aircraft manufacturers are classified in SIC 8731: Commercial Physical and Biological Research.

Industry Snapshot

The aerospace industry consists of space vehicles, space propulsion parts, guided missiles, aircraft, aircraft engines, and aircraft parts. The value of all products and services of the aircraft industry alone was approximately 80 percent of the aerospace industry total in the mid-2000s. The production and sale of civil and military aircraft constitutes about 65 percent of the total aircraft industry's value, while civil aircraft sector sales (engines and parts) account for the remainder of the aircraft segment of the aerospace industry.

Negative conditions within the air transportation sector, due in part to a decrease in travel following the terrorist attacks against the United States on September 11, 2001, affected aircraft manufacturing during the early years of the first decade of the 2000s. However, by 2004 airline traffic numbers finally topped pre-9/11 levels, and the industry was poised for a period of growth. While military spending fueled growth in the mid-years of the decade, commercial sales were expected to have long-term importance. The industry's revenue for 2006 was $69.2 billion, up from the previous year's total of nearly $63 billion. In 2007, there were 254 establishments in this industry and the rebound continued with revenue totaling $83.9 billion. 2008 industry leaders were Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and Northrop Grumman. The aerospace industry reported revenues totaling $79.5 billion in 2011 with gross profit of 30.3 percent. Also, the U.S. aerospace industry sustained its dominance as the global aircraft producer with exports totaling $77.5 billion in 2010, compared to $26.3 billion in imports.

Organization and Structure

U.S. aircraft companies provide airplanes for three distinct markets: the military, commercial aviation, and general aviation, which includes business travel. From the end of World War II until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989, the U.S. military services had a voracious appetite for sophisticated aircraft, which U.S. firms sought to satisfy. This nearly 50-year boom in military spending guaranteed the health of many manufacturers and allowed them to devote resources to research and development, ensuring that U.S. aircraft would be the most technologically advanced in the world. The end of the Cold War, which reduced military spending in the United States and around the world, provided the greatest challenge for U.S. aircraft manufacturing, which had grown accustomed to lucrative Department of Defense contracts.

The development of commercial aircraft posed far greater risks than that of military aircraft. The development process for a passenger airliner capable of carrying several hundred people was both lengthy and costly, requiring manufacturers to anticipate the needs of airlines far in advance and to gamble vast amounts of money on the product's success. For this reason, Boeing canceled its development of super jumbo aircraft. Manufacturers usually designed new or modified aircraft in response to the demands of carriers, who typically asked for more fuel efficiency and more seating rather than major redesigns.

As a result of the risks involved, commercial aircraft manufacturers were conservative, pursuing modifications on existing airframes rather than re-inventing complete aircraft, and most existing commercial airliners changed little in the last half of the twentieth century. However, some exciting developments occurred in speed, range, capacity, and efficiency. Given the tremendous financial risks associated with developing new aircraft, by the early 2000s, many manufacturers worked cooperatively to develop a design and divide work among partners if the design was successful. The development of a new aircraft could involve many dozens of companies, each contributing the portion of a plane that it had perfected. The late-1990s merger of two leading aircraft companies, Boeing Company of Seattle, Washington, and the McDonnell Douglas Company of St. Louis, Missouri, resulted in economies of operation in a number of areas. In a calculated risk, Boeing canceled its plans to develop a super jumbo jet and concentrated instead on long range, fuel-efficient planes with a modestly higher passenger capacity, citing the ratio of development costs to demand as justification.

Although military and commercial aircraft manufacturers dominated the industry in the early 2000s, U.S. companies produced a number of aircraft for the general aviation and the helicopter market segments, which included fixed wing aircraft and rotorcraft for business transportation, regional airline service, recreation, specialized uses such as ambulance service and agricultural spraying, and training. U.S. manufacturers historically produced about 60 percent of the world's general aviation aircraft and 30 percent of the helicopters. The major U.S. manufacturers of general aviation aircraft were the Beech Aircraft Corp., Fairchild Aircraft Inc., the Cessna Aircraft Co., Gulfstream Aerospace, and Learjet Inc.

Most aircraft manufacturers derive a significant amount of their profits from the production of replacement and upgrade parts for their airplanes. Because large commercial jets represent such a large investment, such as a new twin-engine passenger jet that may cost several hundred million dollars, airlines try to keep them in the air for many years. Moreover, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) sets stringent guidelines on repair and replacement procedures for passenger aircraft. Manufacturers provide parts through a network of suppliers and subcontractors, which comprise SIC 3728: Aircraft Parts, Not Elsewhere Classified.

Background and Development

The U.S. aircraft manufacturing industry traces its origin to one of the seminal events of the twentieth century: the Wright brothers' first powered flight in 1903. While many others had flown with gliders, balloons, and dirigibles, Wilbur and Orville Wright marked a tremendous breakthrough with powered flight because they proved the dynamics of flying a wing. In cross section, a wing is flat on the bottom but curved on top. As a wing moves through the air, air passing over the wing is forced to travel a greater distance than air passing under the wing. This difference causes a pocket of low pressure that literally sucks the wing up into the air. In order to work, the wing must be driven forward, or powered. These principles were described years before the Wrights' flight by Samuel P. Langley, a luckless professor whose aviation experiments were either ignored or failures.

The Wrights originally hoped to sell airplanes to the U.S. Army for battlefield reconnaissance. One of those on hand to witness the Wright brothers' first demonstration for the Army was a young conscript named Donald Douglas. Despite several impressive flights, Army officials were unmoved. The Wrights took their show to Europe, where they flew for the German, French, and British armies. In the process, they prompted interest with such European aviation pioneers as Louis Blériot, Willy Messerschmidt, Anthony Fokker, and Marcel Dassault.

Aviation was immediately embraced in Europe as a powerful new force in warfare, but it also was good entertainment. Blériot and others like Louis Paulhan built their own airplanes and began touring flying circuses. During 1910 and 1911, these European aviators toured the United States, flying before garage tinkers like Glenn Martin, Clyde Cessna, Glenn Curtiss, and Bill Boeing. Curtiss, a motorcycle repairman, was immediately drawn to flight and had access to the lightweight engines needed to power aircraft. Curtiss was one of the first to mount a propeller on the front of the aircraft in a "tractor" design. Until that time, propellers had been rear-mounted "pusher" models, which are still found on some aircraft today, particularly amphibians.

After several of the Army's Wright planes crashed, killing the pilots, the Army found a new supplier in Curtiss, who escaped the enforcement of the Wrights' patents by incorporating the first ailerons. Curtiss thus emerged as the nation's leading aircraft manufacturer and the new supplier of choice to the Army.

With the outbreak of war in Europe in 1914, Germany and France were quick to apply aviation to the battlefield, producing the world's first aces, Roland Garros and Manfred von Richtofen. The United States Army embraced air power in 1914 by creating an aviation group within the Signal Corps. One of its first members was Donald Douglas. Douglas, an engineering graduate of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, was briefly employed by Glenn Martin, who had experimented with gliders since 1905. He built his first powered aircraft near Los Angeles in about 1909 with financing from another aviation enthusiast, inventor Alexander Graham Bell. Douglas helped Martin develop his first production aircraft, the TT trainer, before he was dispatched to Washington to oversee the government's aviation program. Thompson's group later purchased Martin's company to form the Wright-Martin Company.

By 1918, the government showed its interest in aviation through expansion of an air squadron and active intervention in the industry. Having seen the effect of air power in Europe during World War I, the government resolved not to see U.S. air power stunted by legal wrangling or patent hoarders. What emerged was a loosely policed competition for government contracts, which were primarily military and later airmail business. Hundreds of airplane builders emerged from garages and warehouses.

Automobile executives were chosen to head the government's ambitious 22,000-plane military aeronautics program. Favored for their ability to turn out huge quantities of a standardized product, these executives openly conspired to keep aircraft builders out of the industry. However, Douglas, a member of the government board, fed information on the aeronautics program to other aircraft designers. Finally, upset with the performance of the Army's air squadron, and disgusted with government bureaucracy, Douglas resigned in 1919 and moved to Los Angeles to start his own company.

Wilbur Wright died in 1912, leaving his brother in charge of their company. A poor manager, Orville Wright naively sold the company and its patents to a group of financiers led by William Boyce Thompson. In 1919, automotive interests led by Delco persuaded Orville Wright to lend his name to another venture called Dayton-Wright. Wright was retained only for his venerable name and its ability to draw investment dollars. As an automotive venture, Dayton-Wright built only aircraft engines, and it later fell under the control of General Motors. At the close of World War I, the government canceled 90 percent of the aircraft it had ordered, forcing many airplane builders to close. An investigation later revealed criminal collusion and widespread scandal among those who were empowered to grant contracts. However, nearly all involved escaped without prosecution.

Having briefly regained the services of Donald Douglas, Glenn Martin abandoned Thompson's company and began an important relationship with General Billy Mitchell, the Army's most powerful advocate of air power. With Mitchell's backing, Martin won a contract to build 20 MB-2 bombers, which Mitchell subsequently used in a spectacular demonstration off the Virginia Capes, sinking the supposedly unsinkable captured German battleship Ostfriesland.

A separate aircraft concern was established in 1914 by Allan and Malcolm Loughead. The brothers built their first aircraft in a small garage in San Francisco with financial backing from Max Mamlock and his Alco Cab company. After crashing it and scaring away Mamlock and his money, the brothers began flying exhibitions and sold Curtiss airplanes to raise money. The Lougheads, intent on military applications for aircraft, embarked on the construction of a large bomber at a site near Santa Barbara. There they met a young builder with an understanding of mathematics named Jack Northrop, whom they asked to join the company as chief engineer.

President Coolidge appointed Dwight Morrow to devise a government program for measured development of the industry in 1925. The resulting Air Commerce Act of 1926 set annual procurement levels for 2,600 military aircraft. Loughead and Northrop, who had drifted for six years, suddenly regained their market and managed to secure financial backing from a Los Angeles venture capitalist named Fred Keeler. As a condition, however, Keeler demanded that Loughead change the spelling of his Scottish-Irish name to accurately match its proper pronunciation. Apparently tired of being addressed as "Mr. Lug Head," Allan relented, and the new company was called Lockheed. The company later completed an all-metal, single-skin model called the Vega. This model, based on a design by Holland's Anthony Fokker, was developed by Northrop, who then left the company to work for Donald Douglas.

Douglas, whose business was growing on the strength of government sales, had been approached by David R. Davis, who offered to invest $40,000 for a transcontinental airliner. With Northrop's help, Douglas produced the Cloudster, and the government ordered several hundred for military use. Davis, fearing the risk, bailed out immediately. The Cloudster, however, led Douglas to a series of successful designs, including the DT series torpedo planes and Douglas World Cruiser. Between 1921 and 1928, Douglas's annual production grew from six aircraft to more than 300.

The growing aircraft industry received a tremendous boost in 1927 when Charles Lindbergh completed the first successful trans-Atlantic flight using a modified Ryan Aeronautical tri-motor. Lindbergh's daring and nearly fatal stunt so strongly revived interest in aviation that investors began to pump millions of dollars into aircraft companies. The following year, Martin moved to Baltimore to be closer to his customers in Washington, D.C. Building bombers, he purchased the engine business of Louis Chevrolet, whose automobile business had been acquired by General Motors.

United Aircraft was the creation of Bill Boeing, a rich Seattle forester who purchased his first plane in 1910 from Glenn Martin and took flying lessons from the builder himself. Boeing and his partner Conrad Westerveldt built a number of early floatplane models for maritime postal delivery. After producing aircraft for the military during World War I, Boeing was persuaded by a customer named Ed Hubbard to form an airline service. In 1920, Boeing won a contract to haul mail between Chicago and Seattle. For the job, he developed a new design, the Model 40, fitted with a Pratt & Whitney engine. Boeing's association with Pratt & Whitney brought him the acquaintance of that company's president, Frederick Rentschler.

The Kelly Airmail Act of 1925 returned airmail service to private bidders after a series of crashes by the government's air service. Postmaster William Folger Brown actively encouraged the formation of large airline companies by carefully awarding profitable airmail contracts. Boeing acquired numerous private airmail companies and their lucrative contract rights and in 1928 banded them together to form the National Air Transport Company. The following year, Boeing and Rentschler merged their airframe and engine businesses to form the United Aircraft & Transportation Company. By the end of 1929 the company had taken over two propeller makers as well as Northrop's Avion company and laid out an air transportation network that later became United Air Lines.

In August of 1929, Allan Loughead (who retained his own name) and Fred Keeler sold the Lockheed Company to a group of automotive investors organized as the Detroit Aircraft company. The company drew tremendous investor interest after aviatrix Amelia Earhart crossed the Atlantic with one of the company's Vegas. Only one month later, world financial markets were buffeted by the stock market crash that plunged the nation into the Great Depression. Aviation company stocks, valued at more than $1 billion on total earnings of more than $9 billion, were decimated.

Detroit Aircraft, whose share price had tumbled from $15 to 12.5 cents, failed in 1932. The Lockheed operation was purchased out of receivership for $40,000 by Robert and Courtlandt Gross. The acquisition included an important new design, the Orion. Meanwhile, Allan Loughead had returned to his original real estate business. Jack Northrop, however, returned to Douglas, where he established yet another company as a subsidiary of the Douglas enterprise.

Douglas was associated with an aviation combine similar to Boeing's, called North American Aviation, which controlled Eastern Airlines and TWA. As a result of this relationship, Douglas, who had grown rich on military contracts, was now called upon to develop commercial airliners for his parent company. The first of these, the Douglas Commercial One, or DC-1, emerged during the worst years of the Depression. In February 1934, the government reduced its subsidy to airmail carriers, creating a sudden demand for faster, more efficient aircraft. Douglas refined his DC design to meet this demand and in 1935 produced the DC-3, an extremely versatile craft that nearly rendered obsolete competitors such as Boeing's 247. The Gross Brothers and their Lockheed Company likewise improved upon earlier designs and emerged with the Electra.

Even Glenn Martin, spurned by the War Department, was brought into the commercial market. The devout Republican was forced to mortgage his plant under a Democratic New Deal program. Desperate for business, Martin built a luxurious flying boat, called the China Clipper, for Pan American's trans-Pacific routes. However, when Martin managed to sell only three Clippers, the government was forced to support his business by purchasing the company's newly developed B-10 bomber.

The Depression would have destroyed the aircraft industry were it not for government support. It became official policy to award contracts to an increasingly privileged club of manufacturers, so that their expertise could be preserved and developed for military purposes. This policy hardened the cycle of concentration promoted by Brown. U.S. aviation was controlled by three huge vertical monopolies, each maintaining huge airframe and engine manufacturing facilities and airline services.

In 1934, Senator Hugo Black completed an investigation of improprieties in these aviation investment trusts, which included United Aircraft, North American Aviation, and a third group called the Aviation Corporation of the Americas, or Avco. Several magnates were called to testify at hearings, including Bill Boeing, Donald Douglas, and Glenn Martin. All admitted huge profiteering from aviation activities but, due to the absence of laws against these practices, no prosecution resulted. Boeing, however, was so incensed by the nature of the investigation that he sold all his aviation interests and retired.

The combines were eventually dissolved on anti-trust grounds, creating an enduring line of business restriction in U.S. aviation. Airframe, engine, and airline companies could no longer be associated in any way. Boeing's conglomerate was divided into the Boeing Company in Seattle, United Aircraft in Connecticut, and United Air Lines, headquartered in Chicago. Likewise, North American Aviation lost its association with TWA and Eastern Airlines, and Avco lost American Airlines and Pan Am. Martin and Lockheed remained intact, as did Consolidated Aircraft, a company whose growth sprung from its acquisition of the defunct Dayton-Wright's designs.

By 1937, the emergence of the DC-3 and Electra enabled airlines to make money from passenger services alone, ending the reliance on airmail. The efficiency of these aircraft was recognized by belligerents in the small wars being fought in Europe and Asia. Unbeknownst to them, Lockheed, Douglas, and Martin frequently sold aircraft to fictional airline companies and other front organizations for the Japanese and German armed forces. This discovery led to neutrality laws, which prescribed an aircraft embargo to any belligerent. However, the demand for aircraft, particularly from Britain and France, was so great that the Roosevelt administration created loopholes designed to allow the export of aircraft to U.S. allies, which enabled the industry to fund development of new designs from large, lucrative export orders.

Much of this development was highly experimental. Northrop, whose subsidiary had been consolidated by Douglas in 1937, formed another company in 1939 with backing from LaMotte Cohu. After raiding Douglas of dozens of engineers, he resumed work on his radical flying wing project. Lockheed produced an equally strange design, a triple-hull fighter called the P-38 Lightning, while Boeing began work on its large B-17 bomber.

Several smaller manufacturers gained admission to the defense industry club during this time. Grumman, a company established in 1929 to build naval aircraft, grew quickly after winning a contract to supply folding-wing F4F Wildcats to the Navy. By 1941 the company, established by Leroy Grumman and Leon Swirbul, had become the primary supplier to the Navy, overtaking even Martin. McDonnell Aircraft began building aircraft on a large scale in 1939, producing fighters for the Army Air Force. Meanwhile, Consolidated merged with the Vultee Company, forming a huge manufacturing operation in Texas called Convair.

While military preparations were stepped up in 1940 and 1941, the event that sparked tremendous growth in the aircraft industry was the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. Huge amounts of government money were poured into engineering and production facilities. President Roosevelt ordered 60,000 aircraft in 1942, and 125,000 the year after. Douglas converted its DC-3 into military cargo planes and bombers, more than 10,000 of which were built. Other manufacturers were suddenly able to complete new designs. Convair produced the B-24 Liberator, and Martin the B-26 and A-30 Baltimore bombers and 70-ton Mars freighter. North American turned out the B-25 Mitchell bomber and the P-51 Mustang, while Douglas added the A-20 Havoc and SBD Dauntless dive bomber. The newly reorganized Curtiss company returned with its C-46 cargo craft. Grumman provided the Navy with its Widgeon, TBF Avenger, and F6F Hellcat.

Boeing, which at one point turned out 16 bombers a day, went into production on its B-29 Super Fortress. Even Ford, which exited the aircraft business during the Depression, was pressed into service, building B-24s. Northrop got his flying wing, the B-49, to fly. With every surface of the craft devoted to creating lift, it was capable of tremendous payloads. The Army, however, refused to develop the boomerang-shaped bomber, fearing possible instability in flight and the use of electronic, rather than cable, controls.

Small airplane builders, such as Beech Aircraft, Cessna, and Piper, also participated in the war effort. However, due to their limited manufacturing facilities and lack of advanced engineering talent, they were relegated to building support aircraft and parts for other manufacturers. Employment in the industry peaked at 1.3 million people in 1943, as every manufacturer participated in some way in the war effort.

The war completely changed the aircraft industry. In addition to demonstrating the power and strategic importance of aerial combat, it established the parallel relationship between investment and technological development. The war allowed the perfection of strategic bombing tactics, carpet bombing, dogfights, naval attack bombing and, in the final days of the war, atomic bombing. Wars that were previously fought with tanks and battleships were now waged from the air. By the end of the war, work had begun on a new generation of aircraft: jets. Larry Bell's Bell Aircraft Company, Lockheed, and McDonnell were the first to experiment with jet power, having gained volumes of captured German jet airframe research.

While the military threat from Germany and Japan had been vanquished, a new adversary emerged in the form of the Soviet Union and became the focus of continued government investment in aviation. The development that began during World War II was scaled down but concentrated in new technologies for long-range strategic bombers to deliver nuclear bombs to targets in the Soviet Union, and speedy fighters to intercept similar threats from Soviet bombers.

Transition to a peacetime economy was considerably better managed than after World War I, due to the Contract Settlement Act of 1944. Nonetheless, the industry was forced to choose between commercial and military manufacturing. North American, Grumman, McDonnell, Northrop, and Vought chose to develop only military craft, while Douglas pursued commercial designs. Boeing, Martin, Lockheed, and Convair elected to develop commercial as well as military designs.

The most important postwar commercial entries were the four-engine Douglas DC-4, the Boeing 377 Stratocruiser, and the triple-finned Lockheed Constellation, designed by Howard Hughes for TWA. Having emerged from the war with tremendous manufacturing capacity and engineering talent, these three companies dominated the commercial aircraft industry. Competitors, including Curtiss, Martin, and Convair, were forced to exit the market in rapid succession, taking refuge in the more secure military businesses. Hughes Aircraft, famed for its massive Spruce Goose amphibian freighter, failed to break into the production market. After building a few experimental designs, it became the plaything of its owner, the millionaire Howard Hughes. Hughes Aircraft later retreated into the missile and aviation controls business.

Boeing and Lockheed also became leading defense suppliers after the war. Lockheed extended its lead in jet fighter designs during the Korean War with its F-94 interceptor and, later, F-104 Starfighter. Boeing developed a family of huge intercontinental bombers, including the B-57, B-50, and B-52. Meanwhile, Convair introduced its B-36, with six pusher propellers, and supersonic B-58 Hustler.

On the recommendations of the Finletter Air Policy Commission, the government made air power the core of its military establishment. While tremendous competition existed for seemingly open-ended military contracts, manufacturers found new ways to commercialize military designs. Boeing was the first to develop an entirely new passenger aircraft with technologies gained from a jet bomber. Boeing requested permission to use government-funded technologies from its successful eight-engine B-52 to develop a new four-engine jetliner called the 707. Eager to prevent a European monopoly in passenger jets since DeHavilland had just introduced its sleek Comet, the government agreed.

Soon after the 707 flew in 1954, American Airlines, a good Douglas customer, announced plans to buy 30 of Boeing's new jets. Douglas, which had put off introduction of a jet in favor of its DC-6s and DC-7s, was forced to rush a similar design into production or risk following Curtiss and Martin into oblivion. Douglas emerged the following year with a highly similar jet design called the DC-8. Ironically, United Air Lines, historically associated with Boeing, placed the first order for the DC-8. Boeing, however, had eclipsed Douglas as the premier American aircraft builder.

Two new jet designs emerged from Europe during the early 1960s, the Sud Aviation Caravelle and Hawker Siddeley Trident. These jetliners featured engines tucked onto the rear of the fuselage, rather than under the wings. At the request of Eastern Airlines, Boeing pursued a three-engine 727, delivered in 1964, while Douglas built a more economical two-engine DC-9, delivered in 1965. Boeing introduced a smaller twin-engine jetliner, the 737, in 1967.

Tremendous consolidation occurred in the aircraft industry during this period. Convair was acquired by General Dynamics in 1952. Martin, which had abandoned aircraft production during the 1950s to concentrate on missiles and aircraft parts, was acquired by the American Marietta Corporation in 1961. North American, a builder of Air Force fighters, was in deep disarray in 1967 after a fire destroyed one of its Apollo space capsules, killing three astronauts. The company was taken over that year by the machinery manufacturer Rockwell Standard. In addition, financial difficulties that year resulting from the DC-8 and DC-9 finally caught up with Douglas. Unable to keep up with the demand for its aircraft, Douglas neared bankruptcy. Eventually, McDonnell Aircraft, a manufacturer of fighter jets and space capsules, prevailed in its bid to acquire Douglas.

The 1960s was a decade of feverish development in military aviation, due to continued investments by the Defense Department in new technologies and academic programs and the creation of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Some of the major accomplishments of this period were in the development of supersonic and rocket-powered aircraft. North American built a six-engine, triple sonic delta wing bomber called the B-70. Obsolete before its first flight, this aircraft evolved into the B-1 Bomber a dozen years later. Lockheed marked two great achievements with its ultra high-altitude U-2 and triple-sonic SR-71 spy planes. Developed in 1964 at Lockheed's super-secret "skunk works," this aircraft continued to be the fastest jet ever to fly in the U.S. arsenal into the mid-2000s.

After abandoning research on a revolutionary nuclear-powered bomber, General Dynamics' Convair group became involved in the development of a multi-use fighter/bomber called the F-111 and the F-16 fighter. During the 1960s McDonnell, Douglas, Martin, Boeing, Grumman, and Convair became major participants in the space program. Other manufacturers were reduced to the production of single-mission aircraft, such as Vought, with its A-7 Corsair, and Fairchild, with its A-10 Warthog. Northrop began work mainly as a subcontractor to McDonnell Douglas, building the F-18.

A post-war boom in private aviation greatly expanded the fortunes of small aircraft manufacturers such as Cessna, Beech, and Piper. General aviation accounted for 17,811, or 90 percent, of all U.S. aircraft by 1978. However, a wave of personal injury law suits precipitated by one pilot's suit against Piper Aircraft severely set back general aviation aircraft manufacturers. Manufacture of the most popular single-engine propeller plane in the world was halted in 1986.

In 1969, aviation engineer Bill Lear introduced the first private jet, which Cessna and Beech later imitated. Fairchild and Beech Aircraft became active in the small airliner market, defined as 19 seats or less. Fairchild, which built the Fokker 27 under contract, developed the Metro airliner. Beech introduced its King Air, followed some years later by its Model 1900. These craft were operated on small airline "feeder" routes.

In commercial circles, a new market emerged for large 300- to 400-passenger jumbo jets. Boeing and McDonnell Douglas, eager to maintain their passenger jet franchises, began the extremely costly development of the 747 and DC-10, respectively. Surprisingly, Lockheed re-entered the market after 20 years, building a three-engine jumbo called the L-1011 Tristar. Boeing was nearly ruined by its four-engine behemoth and at one point was forced to lay off two-thirds of its workforce. McDonnell Douglas fared little better, and Lockheed, mired in huge cost overruns from its massive C-5 Galaxy military cargo plane, required a federal loan guarantee to remain solvent.

The 747 and Tristar hit the market in 1970, and the DC-10 followed in 1971. These aircraft revolutionized air travel by offering airlines the capability to move as many as 400 passengers over distances of up to 5,000 miles. While sales of the DC-10 gained slowly, the 747 soon dominated the skies.

The Airline Deregulation Act, meanwhile, was signed in 1978. This legislation had a tremendous impact on airlines across the country, and plane manufacturers soon felt its repercussions as well. Major national carriers were unprepared for the newly competitive environment created by the act and found themselves with fleets of Boeing 707s and McDonnell Douglas DC-8s that, because of fuel costs, had become prohibitively expensive. In the meantime, new regional carriers utilized fuel-efficient aircraft that fit their needs. The national carriers were forced to examine their fleet configurations and make significant new purchases. Even then, analysts charged that the carriers were sluggish in responding. In many cases, orders for new aircraft were not made to Boeing or McDonnell Douglas or any other manufacturers until well into the 1980s. The backlog of orders subsequently reached all-time high levels, with waiting periods for delivery of one aircraft ranging as long as seven years by 1986.

Efforts to build a supersonic transport, or SST, were abandoned by Lockheed and Boeing in 1970 after the market evaporated and the government refused to cover skyrocketing development costs. A European consortium succeeded in building a jet capable of breaking the speed of sound, but the plane proved so costly to build and operate, and its sonic boom was so disruptive, that flights were severely curtailed and the planes operated at a loss.

McDonnell Douglas developed a family of new military aircraft based on the success of its F-4 Phantom in Vietnam during the 1970s, including the F-15 Eagle and A-4 Skyhawk. Boeing developed its venerable 707 into tankers and powerful AWACs airborne radar platforms, while Lockheed built large new military cargo craft, such as the C-130 and the Galaxy. Northrop remained a strong player in the military market with aging entries, such as its F-5, and failed designs such as the F-20 Tigershark, which was intended for export. Grumman did extremely well in the 1970s with its F-14 Tomcat and a smaller version of the AWACs, the E-2C Hawkeye.

The U.S. military aircraft arsenal gained a huge boost in 1980. The industry, starved for investment since Vietnam, was the primary beneficiary of a massive armament program started by President Carter and tripled by President Reagan. Reagan resurrected Rockwell's $200 million B-1 bomber, canceled by Carter in 1977, and ordered development of a range of new radar-evading aircraft. Pentagon funding poured into these super secret "black projects." One of the beneficiaries was Lockheed, whose success with the SR-71 won it the right to develop the tiny diamond-shaped F-117 Stealth Fighter. Another was not revealed until 1988, when Northrop unveiled its sinister-looking B-2 Stealth Bomber. A flying wing, the B-2 represented the culmination of the late Jack Northrop's life-long dream. It also emerged, along with the B-1, as the replacement for the elderly but still devastating B-52 and the versatile F-111.

The flood of investment into military aircraft resulted in a series of scandals unrivaled since World War I. Several companies were investigated for vastly overcharging the Pentagon and misappropriating funds. In response, the government began to shift contracts from offenders, forcing them to compete for business they had earlier taken for granted. In one of the few signs of growth, a consortium of Lockheed, Boeing, and General Dynamics was chosen to develop the Advanced Tactical Fighter. The ATF was one of the few large military projects remaining in a period of decline for the defense industry.

Significant activity also occurred in the commercial airliner market during the 1980s. Boeing introduced several upgraded versions of its hugely profitable 747, and a new series of economical, large twin-engine aircraft, the 757 and wide-body 767. These aircraft finished off Lockheed's otherwise excellent L-1011, which, with three engines and a larger crew, was discontinued in 1981. Unable to design entirely new aircraft, McDonnell Douglas upgraded its DC-9 into the MD-80 series and offered a similarly improved DC-10, called the MD-11.

The late 1980s and early 1990s saw manufacturers seeking partnerships to develop commercial aircraft. McDonnell Douglas failed to establish a limited merger with Taiwan Aerospace in 1990 and sought a partner to share development costs of a four-engine MD-12 jetliner. Boeing, meanwhile, investigated a partnership with Deutsche Airbus, the disaffected German member of Boeing's archrival, Airbus. Similarly, Boeing was seeking a partner for a planned 1,000-passenger super jumbo craft. Boeing eventually dropped this project due to the billions of dollars necessary to develop a new jet. Airbus remained committed to this questionable project.

The combination of the long-term impact of the hub concept, the increasing concerns of passengers, greater concern for reduced operating costs on the part of the airlines, and rapid technological developments, especially in the area of Global Position Satellite (GPS), affected the industry. GPS navigational devices allow more direct flights from airport to airport. Historically, pilots relied on Omnidirectional Range VOR (VHF) transmitters that emitted a distinct radio signal for each degree of the 360 degrees from magnetic North. For tracking purposes, pilots routinely flew from one VOR at a fixed location to another via established routes, which at lower altitudes was not necessarily a straight line. Pilots using GPS navigational systems could fly in a straight line from airport to airport and even fly an instrument approach using GPS navigational systems that are precise within 50 feet, thus reducing actual mileage necessitated by the fixed location of VORs. This change could reduce both travel time and fuel costs, especially for regional airlines. The growing number of regional jets had the potential to allow the return of more direct flights. Newer, more fuel-efficient planes with longer ranges, such as the Boeing 777, were also expected to impact the airlines.

Aircraft industry analysts expected that the 1990s would be a period of great change in aircraft manufacturing. For years the industry was propelled by ever-increasing military budgets and ever-increasing numbers of commercial airline passengers, but those stimuli changed in the 1990s. Government military expenditures peaked in 1987, when aircraft manufacturers supplied more than 1,200 planes. In 1994, U.S. manufacturers shipped only 755 military aircraft for $7.9 billion in sales, approximately two-thirds the number shipped in 1987. By 1995, the number of military aircraft had dropped to 410, although the value had risen to $11 billion, generally reflecting budget cuts with corresponding reductions in employment by military aircraft manufacturers. During 1992, McDonnell Douglas, General Dynamics, Northrop, Lockheed, Rockwell, and Grumman cut more than 29,000 jobs and were expected to cut another 20,000 jobs over the next two years. The increased competition for scarce military dollars was expected to reduce the number of military aircraft providers or possibly force industry consolidation.

In 1993, the Clinton administration took steps to protect the U.S. aerospace industry's long held technological superiority, increasing NASA's research and development budget, maintaining the DOD's research and development budget, and creating the National Commission to Ensure a Strong, Competitive Airline Industry, which attempted to challenge the subsidies provided by European Community countries to their aircraft manufacturers. Such efforts were expected to maintain the technological superiority of the U.S. aircraft manufacturing base even while the number of manufacturers shrank.

Much of the ordering activity for new planes came from leasing companies. British Aerospace Asset Management's jet and turboprop divisions managed and leased more than 500 planes with $700 million in revenues. Another leader was GE Capital Aviation Services, which ordered 45 Airbus jet transports with options on another 45, with delivery beginning in 1997 and continuing at the rate of 15 to 20 a year until the order was complete. Leasing was the primary means for the global air industry to acquire new aircraft between 1997 and 1999 and beyond.

While military aircraft manufacturers struggled to adjust to changing military budgets, commercial aircraft manufacturers had to adjust to declining demand for aircraft by major carriers, production overcapacity, and government-supported foreign competition in the first half of the 1990s. These challenges became even more pressing in 1991, when for the first time in commercial airline history the number of passengers declined. The drop in air travel prompted many airlines to cancel or postpone orders for aircraft, leaving manufacturers with excess inventory. U.S. manufacturers shipped 408 large transport aircraft valued at $26 billion in 1993, down from their peak of 610 aircraft valued at $30 billion in 1992. Both Boeing and McDonnell Douglas had to reduce production and lay off nearly 10,000 employees each. Fortunately, by 1996, the industry had begun to recover.

Amid industry-wide recession and the so-called "peace dividend," manufacturers were adjusting to a changed marketplace in a number of ways. Most notable was a trend toward industry consolidation and cooperation. Many of the small manufacturers in the industry were eliminated by the recession, and those that survived increasingly banded together to share the risk of developing new products. For both Boeing and McDonnell Douglas, this meant teaming with Asian manufacturers in order to better penetrate the rapidly expanding Asian market. Industry analysts believed that those manufacturers best able to form working partnerships would be the ones to succeed in the 1990s. In 1996 there were many mergers, primarily precipitated by the effects of deregulation and the decline in military contracts.

Industry earnings reached a milestone in 1997 when commercial and foreign customer sales matched sales to the U.S. military, the first time since 1934. By the late 1990s, mergers and acquisitions created three major manufacturers in the United States--Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation, and Raytheon Company, in descending order of size. In July 1998, Lockheed Martin announced the termination of a proposed merger with Northrop Grumman because the U.S. Department of Justice questioned if the merger gave too much market leverage to the merged company in the defense industry.

Both major U.S. aircraft manufacturers, Boeing and Airbus, were affected by the Asian economic crisis during the late 1990s. Although net orders for that period were up 9.7 percent year to year, it was a marked deceleration from the 139 percent gain in the second quarter of 1997 for commercial jet orders. About one-fifth of Boeing's and Airbus's back orders were from Asian airlines, and many such orders were being deferred or canceled.

The competition between Boeing and Airbus also cut into industry profits. Boeing tried to maintain its 65 percent market share while Airbus attempted to gain a 50 percent market, which caused both manufacturers to cut sale prices by as much as 30 percent.

Another factor that played a part in the decline in sales was a decline in air travel, again affected by the Asian economic crisis. The International Air Transport Association (IATA), a Geneva-based international airline industry association, reduced its forecast of Asian air traffic growth from an annualized rate of 7.7 percent down to 3.7 percent from 1999 through 2004. Airbus predicted U.S. air traffic growth to slow to an annualized rate of 3.5 percent, from 5 percent in the 2000s. British Airways, the first commercial airline to foresee the decline in the early 1990s, trimmed its capacity growth rate from 9 percent to less than 3 percent in late 1999.

Demand for larger, longer-range jets was expected to grow because of increased air travel. However, Boeing and Airbus disagreed on the future needs of the industry. Boeing canceled plans to develop a larger capacity 747 jumbo jet, while Airbus continued to design a new super-jumbo jet with seating to accommodate from 500 to 1,000 people.

Along with growth, many airliners faced mandatory retirement due to the noise regulations set by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), a trade association with members consisting of most of the world's air transport regulatory authorities. A deadline of 2002 was agreed upon for all aircraft with a Stage Two designation to be retired. By the year 2000, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) had implemented the ruling that all aircraft flying over U.S. soil had to meet the more stringent Stage Three limits. Most aircraft designated Stage Two were 15 to 20 years old, and thus less efficient.

During the early 2000s, the aircraft industry struggled in the wake of downturns in the air transportation market. The leading U.S. airlines lost more than $7 billion in 2001 and more than $3 billion through the first half of 2002. In addition to a decrease in aircraft orders and falling profits, this drop affected industry employment. The Aerospace Industries Association (AIA) revealed that, according to the U.S. Department of Labor, employment within the aerospace industry reached an all-time low in 2002.

A number of factors, including a slack economy, a decline in travel following the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, and heightened competition from discount airlines contributed to the air transportation sector's woes. In December 2002, United Airlines, which accounted for about 20 percent of U.S. flights, filed for bankruptcy after losing $4 billion over two years and laying off some 20,000 employees.

U.S. manufacturers shipped about 4,088 units of complete civilian aircraft (fixed wing, powered craft; helicopters; and non-powered types of civil aircraft) in 2002, valued at approximately $34.7 billion. In terms of unit shipments, this figure represented a decrease from 2001, when the industry shipped 4,541 units valued at $41.8 billion, and from 2000, when shipments numbered 5,162 civil aircraft valued at $38.6 billion.

In November 2002, the Commission on the Future of the U.S. Aerospace Industry issued a 300-page report to Congress that included nine recommendations to promote the industry's continued health. A few months later, in early 2003, the AIA issued a list of what it considered to be the most pressing issues for the larger aerospace industry, including aircraft. Heading the list was the implementation of the commission's recommendations.

During 2003, the industry remained flat, but both civil and military orders began to pick up significantly during 2004. The United States' wars in Iraq and Afghanistan led to expanded defense funding and military spending. As a result, although the civil aircraft sector suffered during the first half of the 2000s, manufacturing of military aircraft expanded, thus driving growth for the industry. In 2004, revenues from military aircraft, including engines, parts, and service, were $46 billion, up 15 percent from 2003. Although positive growth in the military sector was anticipated for 2005, military funding was expected to level off during the remainder of the decade as the nation turned its attention to matters such as social security and domestic spending.

By mid-decade, the civil aircraft industry segment was showing signs of increased activity. For the first time since 2000, shipment of commercial airliners inched up in 2004, from 281 units in 2003 to 285 units, and both Boeing and Airbus, the world's leading manufacturers, announced plans to increase shipments during 2005. Significant growth came in 2006, when the carriers began to reap the benefits from increased global air traffic. Sales of new aircraft surged 21 percent in 2006. Value of shipments neared $30 billion from just over 400 large commercial aircraft deliveries.

As of the end of the decade, the 254 establishments engaged in this industry segment shipped nearly $84 billion in goods, up from $69.2 the previous year, and employed 159,347 workers who earned more than $11.3 billion in pay. Globally, U.S. companies maintained dominance of the world aircraft industry with exports of more than $54 billion compared to $14.5 in imports.

Current Conditions

In mid-2010, the airline industry was pulling out of one of the worst economic downturns in recent memory. From a loss of $9.4 billion in 2009, the commercial airline segment anticipated a $2.5 billion profit for 2010. Indeed, the last time the industry reported a profit was back in 2007. More good news came with the announcement that commercial airline travel was going to climb 7 percent along with cargo traffic by 18.5 percent during 2010, according to the International Air Transport Association. "The resurgence of orders indicates an upward trend in the industry," Michael Merluzeau, managing partner of aerospace consultant G2 Solutions in Kirkland, Washington told the Los Angeles Times in July 2010, adding that "Last year was a very depressed market. It seems we're now entering a growth mode."

According to the Aerospace Industries Association of America (AIA), aircraft sales reached $211.7 billion in 2010. Following a two-year slump, orders grew 23.8 percent over 2009 to $202.5 billion. In fact, Boeing delivered 462 airplanes around the globe in 2010. That followed with the announcement Boeing would be developing the 737 MAX, which was comparable to the 737 with 496 orders. The U.S. aerospace industry planned to increase research and development expenditures in 2011 to $405.3 billion.

According to the Aerospace Industries Association, the aerospace industry exported $85.3 billion in 2011, which translated into a "�positive trade balance of $55.8 billion"--the largest of any American business sector," as cited from the Washington Business Journal in March 2012. Also, Maryland and Virginia collectively exported $1.6 billion in aerospace and defense products in 2010 alone.

Worldwide civil aircraft demand was expected to climb, especially since fleets were showing their age. There were some analysts who forecast as many as 30,900 aircraft coming into service over the next two decades, growing anywhere from 3 to 5 percent annually through 2020 valued at $3.6 trillion. Finally, leading airframe producers projected global travel will also rise an estimated 5 percent annually through 2020.

Industry Leaders

The Boeing Company acquired the defense and space units of Rockwell International in 1996 and merged with McDonnell Douglas in 1997. In the mid-2000s, Boeing was the world's second largest manufacturer of commercial jetliners behind Airbus and military aircraft behind Lockheed Martin, as well as a leading NASA contractor. Boeing posted 2008 sales of $61.9 billion. The company reported record revenues of $68.7 billion in 2010, up 7 percent compared to $64.3 billion in 2010. Boeing employed 171,700 people throughout the U.S. and in 70 countries in 2010.

Plagued by production problems during the late 1990s, Boeing lost orders for aircraft to Airbus Industries from large companies such as British Airways, United Parcel Service, and Boulhoun Aviation Services. By the mid-2000s, Boeing returned to firmer ground, buoyed by an increase in military contracts and anticipating stronger commercial sales. Because of Boeing's production problems, however, Airbus S.A.S. was able to move ahead of Boeing in orders beginning in 2001. Airbus began as a five-nation European consortium named Airbus Industrie. It was conceived as a European answer to the United States' domination of the large commercial transport market.

Lockheed Martin, the leading U.S. defense contractor, experienced steady growth during the first decade of the 2000s, reporting $42.7 billion in 2008, up from $40.37 billion in sales in 2006 and from $35.53 billion in 2004. Based in Bethesda, Maryland, the company built F-16 and F-22 fighters and the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (Lightning II), which was in a 10-year System Development and Demonstration (SDD) phase that began in 2001. The company continued along its growth path with net sales totaling $43.8 billion in 2009 and $45.6 billion net sales posted in 2010, before reaching net sales at $46.4 billion in 2011.

Northrop Grumman Corp., based in Los Angeles, is a global defense and technology company with 120,000 employees. The nation's third largest defense contractor, the firm is responsible for the design, development, and manufacture of aircraft (including the Stealth Bomber), aircraft sub-assemblies, and electronic systems for the military. The company's revenue was remarkably steady through the middle 2000s with revenue of $29 billion, $30 billion, and $30.14 billion from 2004 through 2006, respectively. The company boosted revenue to $33.9 billion in 2008. Northrop Grumman's revenues began to decline in the late 2000s with revenue of $27.6 billion, $28.1 billion, and $26.4 billion from 2009 through 2011. Of the reported $27.6 billion in revenues for 2009, the aerospace segment was responsible for $10.4 billion in revenues and nearly $11 billion in revenues for 2010. The company employed 72,500 workers in 2011.

The world's largest helicopter manufacturer is European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company (EADS). EADS North America is the U.S. holding company for the North American activities. A global leader in aerospace, defense, and related services, Grand Prairie, Texas-based EADS manufactures Airbus.


The aircraft industry's workforce was reduced significantly during the economic downturn that affected the aircraft industry during the early to mid-2000s. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, aircraft industry employment was 157,241 in 2006 and increased slightly to 159,347 in 2007.

In the 2009 congressional report, California, Washington, Texas, Kansas, Connecticut, and Arizona represented 60 percent of U.S. aerospace jobs in the U.S. However, California supported an estimated 20 percent of overall aerospace employees from coast to coast. Others with high aerospace employment included Oklahoma, Florida, Georgia, Ohio, Mississippi, Alabama, and South Carolina. During 2009 the aircraft industry employed 234,900 workers before declining to 228,200 workers in 2010 and then rebounding to 235,000 workers in 2011.

© COPYRIGHT 2018 The Gale Group, Inc. This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group, Farmington Hills, Michigan. All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group. For permission to reuse this article, contact the Copyright Clearance Center.

News and information about Aircraft

Doc Sweeney Blue Tiger Drumset
Modern Drummer : MD; April 1, 2018; 700+ words
...milled, and the lugs are a proprietary design utilizing aircraft-grade aluminum with stainless-steel tubes and fasteners...more tuning stability. Sweeney's lugs are made from 6061 aircraft-grade aluminum and feature 303 stainless-steel tubes and...
Conditions Apply
Business Today; April 8, 2018; 610 words
...and an unspecified number of service and maintenance engineers, with two A320 full flight simulators. The firm has over 300 aircraft in service in India and another 530 scheduled for delivery. E. Kumar SharmaFarmer unrest Days after the Maharashtra government...
Thinking Ahead
India Today; March 26, 2018; 640 words
...approaches to futuristic architecture. Some believe that it has to 'be green' and green buildings should be designed like an aircraft-highly engineered and hermetically sealed, to achieve a high degree of efficiency. This may work in some environments but...
IAF Aircraft Crash: Black Box Recovered
The Pioneer; March 22, 2018; 358 words
...March 22 -- A day after a trainer aircraft of the Indian Air Force (IAF) crashed...the black box from the wreckage of the aircraft, which was lying scattered over a information about the crash of the aircraft at around 1 pm yesterday," said Jamshedpur...
International Airlines Group Adopts Connected Aircraft Solution
Airline Industry Information; March 21, 2018; 659 words
...Group across its fleet of more than 500 aircraft, the company said. The parent company...LEVEL and Vueling will use the Connected Aircraft flight data analytics platform, which...every commercial, defense and space aircraft, and its turbochargers are used by nearly...
Israel : IAI Focuses Efforts on Green Energy for the Development of Electrically-Powered Aircraft
Mena Report; March 21, 2018; 626 words
...future development of electrically powered aircraft, combining environmental benefits together...The demand for electrically powered aircraft is projected to reach hundreds of aircrafts...power is mainly limited to very light aircraft, IAI estimates that as the technology...
IAF Aircraft Crashes in Mayurbhanj
The Pioneer; March 21, 2018; 341 words
BARIPADA, March 21 -- A trainer aircraft of the Indian Air Force (IAF) crashed...eject safely by parachute before the Hawk aircraft crashed.The trainee pilot sustained...Jharpokharia in Mayurbhanj district. The aircraft had taken off from the Kalaikunda Air...
United States : Honeywell Expands Connected Aircraft Reach with Versatile New Router
Mena Report; March 21, 2018; 583 words
...industry-leading range of Connected Aircraft offerings and setting a new benchmark...makes it more accessible for all kinds of aircraft. Just as important, it provides the...operators need to enable the Connected Aircraft. It gives them access to all kinds of...

Search all articles about Aircraft